US158 over DUKE SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.44451, -76.6243236°26'40" N, 76°37'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US158 over DUKE SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000000730021 |
Old structure number: | 000000000073021 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.7 MI. W. OF JCT. NC32 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 136.2 ft. [41.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.7 ft. [11.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,600 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 3600 | 82.8 |
January 2016 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 3500 | 81.9 |
January 2014 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 3600 | 81.8 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 3800 | 81.7 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5000 | 81.0 |
January 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 4400 | 82.4 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4300 | 93.8 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4000 | 93.9 |
March 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4100 | 93.9 |
February 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2700 | 92.6 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3400 | 92.2 |
March 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3400 | 92.2 |
July 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2500 | 92.7 |
April 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2500 | 92.7 |
March 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2300 | 92.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 685 | 682 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,959 | 4,958 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,620 | 4,620 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 102 | 64 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 148 | 133 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 74 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 30 | 6 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 60 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 274 | 262 | 2 | 10 | 0 |