SR1320 over DUKE SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.46965, -76.6360336°28'11" N, 76°38'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1320 over DUKE SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000000730026 |
Location: | .03 MI W OF JCT SR 1305 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
Total length: | 151.9 ft. [46.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2011 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 220 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 220 | 99.9 |
January 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 270 | 99.9 |
January 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 270 | 99.9 |
January 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 290 | 99.9 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 390 | 39.0 |
January 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 390 | 49.3 |
February 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 350 | 39.1 |
November 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 360 | 40.1 |
March 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 430 | 38.9 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 370 | 40.0 |
March 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 300 | 32.1 |