Share: 
SR1219 over HACKLEY SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.48324, -76.79161
36°28'60" N, 76°47'30" W
+36.48324, -76.79161
36°28'60" N, 76°47'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SR1219 over HACKLEY SWAMP |
| Structure number: | 000000000730105 |
| Old structure number: | 000000000073105 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 0.01 MI. E. JCT. SR1217 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Total length: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1992 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 330 [as of 2013] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2018 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 330 | 100.0 |
| January 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 440 | 88.8 |
| January 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 440 | 88.8 |
| January 2012 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 440 | 88.8 |
| January 2010 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 440 | 99.8 |
| January 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 440 | 99.8 |
| November 2005 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 420 | 99.8 |
| September 2003 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 250 | 88.9 |
| February 2002 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 180 | 88.9 |
| February 2000 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 140 | 88.9 |
| March 1998 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 100 | 89.0 |
| March 1996 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 100 | 89.0 |
| July 1994 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 200 | 88.9 |
| April 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 200 | 99.9 |
| March 1990 | Fair | N out of 10 | 80 | 78.7 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1326229
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1326229