Share: 
SR1123 over WEST BUFFALO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.32063, -83.90561
35°19'14" N, 83°54'20" W
+35.32063, -83.90561
35°19'14" N, 83°54'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SR1123 over WEST BUFFALO CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000750018 |
| Location: | .7 MI.N.JCT.SR1121 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1980 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 130 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| May 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| May 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| May 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| June 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| August 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| July 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| June 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| June 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| July 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 99.9 |
| July 1991 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1326250
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1326250