SR1058 over NAHUNTA SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+35.48893, -77.8060135°29'20" N, 77°48'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1058 over NAHUNTA SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000000790018 |
Old structure number: | 000000000079018 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.4 MI. W. JCT. SR1201 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.2 ft. [8.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1978 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 760 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.7 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 760 | 63.7 |
December 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 760 | 90.6 |
December 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 760 | 90.6 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 990 | 90.5 |
December 2009 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1000 | 90.5 |
March 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 940 | 90.5 |
March 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 940 | 90.5 |
November 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1100 | 90.5 |
September 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1200 | 90.4 |
September 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 970 | 90.5 |
July 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 800 | 84.3 |
July 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 700 | 95.7 |
May 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 700 | 95.7 |
September 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 500 | 87.2 |
July 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 350 | 88.3 |