SR1140 over BEAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.41429, -77.8156735°24'51" N, 77°48'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1140 over BEAR CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000790026 |
Location: | 0.8MI.S.W.JCT.SR1137 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 62.0 ft. [18.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1952 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 640 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 57.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 640 | 57.8 |
December 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 670 | 57.8 |
December 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 670 | 57.8 |
December 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 700 | 53.2 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 680 | 63.1 |
December 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 650 | 63.1 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 720 | 39.7 |
December 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 32.8 |
February 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 640 | 39.8 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 640 | 39.8 |
February 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 600 | 35.1 |
August 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 450 | 32.2 |