SR1004 over CONTENTNEA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.41324, -77.4978435°24'48" N, 77°29'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1004 over CONTENTNEA CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000790038 |
Old structure number: | 000000000079038 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.9 MI. S. OF JCT. SR1411 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Total length: | 332.0 ft. [101.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1955 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,000 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 66.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 2000 | 66.0 |
January 2016 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 2000 | 64.9 |
January 2014 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 2000 | 64.9 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 1900 | 65.1 |
January 2010 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Serious | 1900 | 30.6 |
March 2008 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 2800 | 39.3 |
March 2006 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 1800 | 47.1 |
December 2003 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 1900 | 46.9 |
May 2002 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 2700 | 42.7 |
September 2000 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 2700 | 42.7 |
August 1998 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 2400 | 43.4 |
August 1996 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 1800 | 47.1 |
June 1994 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 1500 | 47.8 |
September 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1300 | 74.6 |
July 1990 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1700 | 72.0 |