NC4 over BEAR SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.27798, -77.8842936°16'41" N, 77°53'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC4 over BEAR SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000000830052 |
Location: | 0.4 MI.S.JCT.SR1322 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 106.0 ft. [32.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,100 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1100 | 63.8 |
July 2015 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1100 | 63.8 |
July 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1100 | 63.8 |
July 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1200 | 63.7 |
July 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1100 | 62.6 |
November 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1200 | 62.5 |
October 2005 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1400 | 64.4 |
September 2003 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1300 | 64.5 |
September 2001 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1000 | 64.8 |
October 2000 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 980 | 64.8 |
July 1998 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 970 | 64.9 |
June 1990 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1000 | 58.4 |