Share:

SR1101 over TRIB.OF DEEP CRK.

Map

Coordinates:
+36.10941, -77.44486
36°06'34" N, 77°26'41" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR1101 over TRIB.OF DEEP CRK.
Structure number:000000000830080
Location:0.2 MI.W.JCT.US258
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:370 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:72.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2018Poor4 out of 1037072.8
January 2016Good7 out of 1037099.8
January 2014Good7 out of 1037099.8
January 2012Good7 out of 1042099.8
January 2010Good7 out of 1040099.8
April 2008Good8 out of 1025099.9
June 2005Good8 out of 10110100.0
July 2003Good8 out of 1045099.8
August 2001Good8 out of 1048099.8
November 1999Good8 out of 1046099.8
July 1991FairN out of 1040047.9