Share: 
SR1101 over TRIB.OF DEEP CRK.
Map
Coordinates:
+36.10941, -77.44486
36°06'34" N, 77°26'41" W
+36.10941, -77.44486
36°06'34" N, 77°26'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SR1101 over TRIB.OF DEEP CRK. |
| Structure number: | 000000000830080 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI.W.JCT.US258 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1999 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 370 [as of 2012] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 72.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2018 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 370 | 72.8 |
| January 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 370 | 99.8 |
| January 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 370 | 99.8 |
| January 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 420 | 99.8 |
| January 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 400 | 99.8 |
| April 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 250 | 99.9 |
| June 2005 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 110 | 100.0 |
| July 2003 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 450 | 99.8 |
| August 2001 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 480 | 99.8 |
| November 1999 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 460 | 99.8 |
| July 1991 | Fair | N out of 10 | 400 | 47.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1327481
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1327481