US421 NBL over DIRT
Map
Coordinates:
+35.32963, -78.6626735°19'47" N, 78°39'46" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US421 NBL over DIRT |
Structure number: | 000000000850023 |
Location: | 0.9 MI.S.JCT.NC55 |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Total length: | 111.9 ft. [34.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1957 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,000 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7000 | 78.9 |
February 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7000 | 78.9 |
February 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5000 | 79.5 |
February 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 6500 | 64.5 |
February 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7000 | 76.8 |
January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 6500 | 77.0 |
January 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 6500 | 77.0 |
January 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 4050 | 65.5 |
February 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 7000 | 64.3 |
January 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 6700 | 64.4 |
January 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 9400 | 52.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 88 | 78 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 20 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 116 | 115 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 228 | 222 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 970 | 970 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,532 | 2,272 | 1 | 1,259 | 0 |