SR2045 over LOWER LITTLE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+35.23162, -78.8783835°13'54" N, 78°52'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR2045 over LOWER LITTLE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000850074 |
Old structure number: | 000000000085074 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.5 MI.S.SR2050 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 59.1 ft. [18.0 m] |
Total length: | 181.1 ft. [55.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1961 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,900 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 69.7 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2900 | 69.7 |
June 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 2400 | 58.7 |
June 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 70.0 |
June 2012 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 1900 | 60.7 |
June 2010 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 680 | 80.0 |
August 2008 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 680 | 80.0 |
June 2006 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 2000 | 69.6 |
April 2004 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 730 | 77.7 |
May 2002 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 740 | 77.7 |
February 2000 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1200 | 70.8 |
January 1998 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 69.7 |
January 1996 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 69.7 |
January 1994 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1000 | 48.7 |
March 1992 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1000 | 48.7 |
March 1990 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 400 | 53.4 |