US258 over TUCKAHOE SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+35.01205, -77.6368135°00'43" N, 77°38'13" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US258 over TUCKAHOE SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000001030001 |
Old structure number: | 000000000103001 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.7 MI N JCT NC41 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
Total length: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 33.8 ft. [10.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Year reconstructed: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,700 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 4700 | 82.1 |
February 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 9500 | 77.0 |
February 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 9500 | 77.0 |
July 2012 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 4400 | 82.4 |
August 2010 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4200 | 94.2 |
October 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4200 | 94.2 |
October 2006 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 95.4 |
October 2004 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 95.4 |
October 2002 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4100 | 95.3 |
January 2001 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 95.4 |
October 1998 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 95.4 |
October 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 95.4 |
November 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 3700 | 95.6 |
October 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 3800 | 95.5 |
October 1990 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 4000 | 95.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 185 | 0 | 173 | 12 | 0 |