Share:

US258 over TUCKAHOE SWAMP

Map

Coordinates:
+35.01205, -77.63681
35°00'43" N, 77°38'13" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US258 over TUCKAHOE SWAMP
Structure number:000000001030001
Old structure number:000000000103001 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.7 MI N JCT NC41
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:8.9 ft. [2.7 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.8 ft. [10.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1950
Year reconstructed:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,700 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:82.1

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2018Fair5 out of 10470082.1
February 2016Fair5 out of 10950077.0
February 2014Fair5 out of 10950077.0
July 2012Fair5 out of 10440082.4
August 2010Fair6 out of 10420094.2
October 2008Fair6 out of 10420094.2
October 2006Fair6 out of 10400095.4
October 2004Fair6 out of 10400095.4
October 2002Fair6 out of 10410095.3
January 2001Fair6 out of 10400095.4
October 1998Fair6 out of 10400095.4
October 1996Fair6 out of 10400095.4
November 1994Fair6 out of 10370095.6
October 1992Fair6 out of 10380095.5
October 1990Fair6 out of 10400095.4

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.1850173120