US17 NC58 over TRENT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+35.01000, -77.2190135°00'36" N, 77°13'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US17 NC58 over TRENT RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000001030009 |
Location: | 0.9 MI.N. OF JCT.NC58 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 63.0 ft. [19.2 m] |
Total length: | 233.9 ft. [71.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.3 ft. [19.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1959 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 10,000 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 74.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10000 | 74.3 |
November 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 11000 | 72.8 |
November 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 11000 | 85.2 |
November 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 11000 | 72.8 |
November 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10000 | 86.1 |
November 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10000 | 86.1 |
December 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 9900 | 86.2 |
November 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 9900 | 86.2 |
November 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 11000 | 85.2 |
February 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 9800 | 86.3 |
November 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 9200 | 86.8 |
November 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 7900 | 87.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 2,320 | 2,288 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 22,320 | 22,320 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 14,598 | 13,768 | 800 | 30 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 14,598 | 14,091 | 105 | 402 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 132 | 28 | 101 | 3 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 71 | 2 | 69 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 316 | 195 | 91 | 30 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 280 | 280 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 80 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 80 | 67 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 472 | 418 | 53 | 1 | 0 |