NC58 over TRENT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+35.07869, -77.4194435°04'43" N, 77°25'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC58 over TRENT RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000001030023 |
Location: | 1.0 MI.W.JCT.NC41 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 240.2 ft. [73.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1955 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 6 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,600 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 70.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 2600 | 70.9 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2600 | 69.3 |
October 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 80.7 |
October 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2600 | 70.4 |
October 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 4100 | 58.5 |
October 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2700 | 81.5 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2900 | 71.3 |
October 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2900 | 71.3 |
October 2002 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 3000 | 71.2 |
January 2001 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2700 | 81.5 |
October 1998 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2500 | 81.6 |
August 1991 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2400 | 80.0 |