SR1155 over JOSHUA BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+35.09262, -77.5726935°05'33" N, 77°34'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1155 over JOSHUA BRANCH |
Structure number: | 000000001030072 |
Old structure number: | 000000000103072 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.6 MI.NE. OF JCT.SR1153 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 51.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 90 | 51.4 |
October 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 90 | 51.4 |
October 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 90 | 51.4 |
October 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 90 | 51.4 |
October 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 80 | 62.2 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 62.2 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 90 | 56.0 |
October 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 90 | 56.0 |
October 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 90 | 56.0 |
January 2001 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 150 | 51.9 |
November 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 150 | 51.9 |
October 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 170 | 51.9 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 53.9 |
October 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 80 | 56.1 |
October 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 80 | 66.2 |