US70BU/258BU/NC58N over NEUSE RIVER OVERF
Map
Coordinates:
+35.24862, -77.5815835°14'55" N, 77°34'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US70BU/258BU/NC58N over NEUSE RIVER OVERF |
Structure number: | 000000001070028 |
Location: | 0.3 MI NE OF JCT US70BYP |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 245.1 ft. [74.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 1° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1954 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,000 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7000 | 76.0 |
April 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7000 | 76.0 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7000 | 72.2 |
April 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8000 | 61.2 |
July 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8000 | 61.2 |
May 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8000 | 72.9 |
March 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8500 | 74.7 |
June 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8500 | 74.7 |
May 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8500 | 74.7 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9250 | 74.6 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6700 | 71.0 |