US70 EB US258S over NEUSE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+35.26104, -77.6191435°15'40" N, 77°37'09" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US70 EB US258S over NEUSE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000001070060 |
Location: | 1.2 MI.NW.NC11 55 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 405.9 ft. [123.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.4 ft. [11.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 9 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 14,000 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 14000 | 84.5 |
April 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 14000 | 84.5 |
April 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 14500 | 84.4 |
April 2012 | Poor | Good | Fair | Poor | 13500 | 68.1 |
April 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 15000 | 67.9 |
July 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 15000 | 67.9 |
May 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 14500 | 68.0 |
March 2004 | Poor | Good | Very Good | Poor | 14500 | 68.0 |
June 2002 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 14500 | 95.6 |
May 2000 | Poor | Good | Very Good | Poor | 13700 | 68.1 |
February 1998 | Poor | Good | Very Good | Poor | 13700 | 68.1 |
January 1992 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 8100 | 90.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 2,025 | 1,972 | 42 | 11 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 14,821 | 14,819 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 98 | 83 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 68 | 62 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 370 | 179 | 177 | 14 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 304 | 274 | 11 | 19 | 0 |
Bearings |
Other Bearing | each | 90 | 5 | 70 | 15 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 90 | 5 | 0 | 70 | 15 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 814 | 801 | 3 | 10 | 0 |