NC11/NC55 over NEUSE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+35.25887, -77.5835535°15'32" N, 77°35'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC11/NC55 over NEUSE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000001070064 |
Location: | .2 M. W. JCT. US258 BUS |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
Total length: | 315.0 ft. [96.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 94.8 ft. [28.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,100 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 9100 | 79.3 |
April 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 9000 | 95.8 |
April 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 9200 | 83.4 |
April 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 9700 | 83.3 |
April 2010 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | 9700 | 94.6 |
July 2008 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | 9700 | 94.6 |
May 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 8900 | 67.0 |
May 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 8900 | 67.0 |
February 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 10000 | 94.8 |
June 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 13000 | 66.4 |
May 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Very Good | Poor | 11600 | 66.9 |
February 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 11600 | 94.4 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 8600 | 92.9 |