SR1502 over BRANCH OF BEAR SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.32728, -77.2848436°19'38" N, 77°17'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1502 over BRANCH OF BEAR SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000001310024 |
Old structure number: | 000000000131024 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1.7 MI.E.JCT.NC305 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.2 ft. [8.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 310 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 310 | 76.8 |
December 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 310 | 76.8 |
December 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 310 | 76.8 |
December 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 360 | 87.8 |
December 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 820 | 80.5 |
December 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 300 | 87.8 |
March 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 200 | 92.4 |
December 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 92.4 |
January 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 360 | 87.8 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 310 | 87.8 |
May 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 310 | 87.8 |
March 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 350 | 79.6 |
January 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 300 | 86.8 |
March 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 300 | 86.8 |
July 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 230 | 91.9 |