NC305 over URAHAW SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.30066, -77.3060736°18'02" N, 77°18'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC305 over URAHAW SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000001310033 |
Old structure number: | 000000000131033 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.4 MI N JCT SR 1520 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Total length: | 85.0 ft. [25.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1922 |
Year reconstructed: | 1952 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,300 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 55.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2300 | 55.5 |
February 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2300 | 55.5 |
February 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2200 | 54.2 |
February 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2400 | 53.4 |
February 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2500 | 53.2 |
March 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2600 | 51.4 |
January 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2600 | 51.4 |
January 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2500 | 54.8 |
March 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2400 | 55.0 |
April 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2400 | 55.0 |
March 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2500 | 57.7 |
February 1995 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2400 | 52.1 |
February 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2400 | 52.1 |
April 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2200 | 49.1 |