NC210 over GUILFORDS BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+34.44377, -78.0018134°26'38" N, 78°00'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC210 over GUILFORDS BRANCH |
Structure number: | 000000001410025 |
Old structure number: | 000000000141025 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.3 MI E. OF JCT SR1400 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Year reconstructed: | 1956 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,400 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3400 | 78.1 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3400 | 78.1 |
September 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3400 | 64.7 |
September 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3800 | 64.5 |
September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3700 | 76.8 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3900 | 76.7 |
December 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5400 | 60.7 |
December 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5400 | 60.7 |
December 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4500 | 71.4 |
January 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4700 | 71.3 |
April 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4200 | 71.5 |
July 1997 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 3200 | 72.1 |
June 1995 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2600 | 78.8 |
May 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2500 | 76.1 |
April 1991 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2300 | 76.2 |