NC53 over ANGOLA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.65625, -77.7351534°39'23" N, 77°44'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC53 over ANGOLA CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001410037 |
Old structure number: | 000000000141037 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 2.0 MI W. OF JCT NC50 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Total length: | 127.0 ft. [38.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.5 ft. [9.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1947 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,300 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3300 | 59.9 |
October 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3300 | 50.8 |
October 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3300 | 50.8 |
October 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3300 | 50.8 |
October 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 3000 | 63.7 |
December 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2800 | 52.9 |
January 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 3000 | 37.1 |
February 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 3000 | 37.1 |
July 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 3300 | 36.1 |
January 2001 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 3800 | 34.3 |
May 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 3500 | 35.4 |
July 1997 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 3500 | 35.4 |
June 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 2700 | 45.9 |
May 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 2400 | 42.7 |
April 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 2400 | 42.7 |