US17 BUS. over PERQUIMANS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+36.19411, -76.4664336°11'39" N, 76°27'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US17 BUS. over PERQUIMANS RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000001430008 |
Old structure number: | 000000000143008 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.2 MI.N.JCT SR1110 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 158.1 ft. [48.2 m] |
Total length: | 640.1 ft. [195.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 62.3 ft. [19.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Movable - Swing [17] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,500 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 3.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 5500 | 3.0 |
December 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 5500 | 6.0 |
December 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 5500 | 6.0 |
December 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 4400 | 5.0 |
December 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 5200 | 6.0 |
December 2007 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 5900 | 6.0 |
October 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 4900 | 6.0 |
May 2004 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 4900 | 6.0 |
April 2002 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 4700 | 28.5 |
April 2000 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 2500 | 12.7 |
April 1998 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 2500 | 12.7 |
July 1996 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 4700 | 6.0 |
March 1994 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 4700 | 28.7 |
May 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 4000 | 29.2 |
February 1990 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 3800 | 8.9 |