SR1322 over LITTLE WHITE OAK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.30006, -82.1382735°18'00" N, 82°08'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1322 over LITTLE WHITE OAK CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001490114 |
Location: | 1 MI.W.JCT.SR1323 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 90.9 ft. [27.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 56.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 90 | 56.3 |
July 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 90 | 48.3 |
July 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 90 | 48.3 |
July 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 300 | 38.0 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 48.9 |
August 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 48.9 |
August 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 56.1 |
July 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 56.1 |
September 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 60 | 51.1 |
September 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 70 | 56.1 |
August 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 70 | 62.3 |