US74 BUS over LEITH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.76288, -79.4211634°45'46" N, 79°25'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US74 BUS over LEITH CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001650031 |
Location: | 0.45 MI. E. JCT. SR1323 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Total length: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.8 ft. [10.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1924 |
Year reconstructed: | 1941 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,000 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 69.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 4000 | 69.2 |
March 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3300 | 69.3 |
March 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3300 | 69.3 |
March 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 4000 | 69.2 |
March 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3700 | 80.0 |
September 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3800 | 80.0 |
August 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 4950 | 85.3 |
May 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 4950 | 85.3 |
August 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 4800 | 85.3 |
July 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 4500 | 88.0 |
June 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 5100 | 88.2 |
April 1990 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4850 | 78.4 |