SR1615 over LEITH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.65979, -79.4498434°39'35" N, 79°26'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1615 over LEITH CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001650050 |
Location: | 0.3 MI. E. JCT. SR1624 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
Total length: | 122.1 ft. [37.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2017 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 310 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 310 | 99.9 |
February 2016 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 270 | 39.8 |
February 2014 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 260 | 39.8 |
February 2012 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 1400 | 29.8 |
March 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 250 | 40.8 |
September 2008 | Poor | Very Good | Satisfactory | Serious | 250 | 40.8 |
August 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 450 | 39.6 |
May 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 450 | 39.6 |
August 2002 | Poor | Very Good | Fair | Serious | 450 | 39.6 |
August 2000 | Poor | Very Good | Fair | Poor | 230 | 40.8 |
June 1998 | Poor | Very Good | Fair | Serious | 230 | 40.8 |
April 1990 | Poor | Very Good | Fair | Poor | 100 | 65.9 |