SR1712 over ZILPHY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.37205, -80.1328236°22'19" N, 80°07'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1712 over ZILPHY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001690101 |
Location: | 0.4 MI. N. JCT. SR1732 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2006 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9] |
Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 760 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 760 | 99.8 |
February 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 760 | 99.8 |
February 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 910 | 99.8 |
February 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 910 | 99.8 |
February 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 890 | 99.8 |
February 2007 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 850 | 99.8 |
January 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 70 | 100.0 |
February 2005 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 70 | 56.0 |
February 2003 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 70 | 56.0 |
March 2001 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 140 | 55.9 |
April 1999 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 130 | 55.9 |
January 1991 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 100 | 49.9 |