Share: 
SR1759 over REED CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.38247, -80.06641
36°22'57" N, 80°03'59" W
+36.38247, -80.06641
36°22'57" N, 80°03'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SR1759 over REED CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000001690118 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI. N. JCT. SR1690 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 25° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1985 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 540 [as of 2012] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 72.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 540 | 72.8 |
| January 2015 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 540 | 72.8 |
| January 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 500 | 88.9 |
| January 2011 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 560 | 99.9 |
| January 2009 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 630 | 99.9 |
| February 2007 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 553 | 99.9 |
| January 2005 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 553 | 99.9 |
| January 2003 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 520 | 72.8 |
| February 2001 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 440 | 72.8 |
| January 1999 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 500 | 72.8 |
| November 1990 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 400 | 99.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1335974
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1335974