Share: 
NC94 over CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+35.65651, -76.20772
35°39'23" N, 76°12'28" W
+35.65651, -76.20772
35°39'23" N, 76°12'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | NC94 over CANAL |
| Structure number: | 000000001770003 |
| Location: | 1 MI. N. OF JCT. SR1322 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 4.9 ft. [1.5 m] |
| Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 2004 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 430 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 430 | 78.2 |
| November 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 570 | 78.1 |
| November 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 570 | 78.1 |
| December 2011 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 490 | 78.8 |
| December 2009 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1100 | 71.1 |
| December 2007 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 520 | 78.4 |
| March 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 490 | 90.4 |
| July 2003 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 570 | 77.9 |
| July 2002 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 640 | 77.1 |
| April 2000 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 560 | 78.0 |
| July 1998 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 420 | 79.5 |
| February 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 400 | 92.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1336640
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1336640