NC94 over RIDERS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.89170, -76.2338735°53'30" N, 76°14'02" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC94 over RIDERS CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001770008 |
Location: | 0.2 MI.N. OF JCT.SR1301 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1962 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,800 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 1800 | 60.1 |
February 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2000 | 76.0 |
February 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2000 | 76.0 |
February 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1900 | 76.0 |
February 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1800 | 71.8 |
February 2008 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 1800 | 69.6 |
March 2006 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 1800 | 69.6 |
March 2004 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 1800 | 69.6 |
March 2002 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 1800 | 69.6 |
March 2000 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 2000 | 71.8 |
March 1998 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 2000 | 82.9 |
February 1992 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1600 | 78.0 |