S AVE over MINNOW CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.42167, -96.7066742°25'18" N, 96°42'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | S AVE over MINNOW CREEK |
Structure number: | C002200320 |
Location: | 2.4N 5.8W OF HUBBARD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Total length: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 65 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 20.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 65 | 20.4 |
October 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 65 | 20.4 |
October 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 65 | 20.4 |
December 2011 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 65 | 30.0 |
December 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 65 | 32.1 |
November 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 65 | 23.8 |
August 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 65 | 25.8 |
September 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 65 | 25.8 |
September 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 65 | 25.8 |
September 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 65 | 25.8 |
August 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 65 | 25.8 |
May 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 65 | 25.8 |
June 1994 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 65 | 26.1 |
October 1992 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 65 | 26.1 |
November 1989 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 65 | 18.8 |