Inwood Road over WIGLE CREEK
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+42.28574, -96.5394842°17'09" N, 96°32'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Inwood Road over WIGLE CREEK |
Structure number: | C002203405P |
Location: | 1.9S 2W OF HOMER |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Total length: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1920 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2011
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 19.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $223,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2011 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 25 | 19.3 |
December 2009 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 25 | 19.3 |
November 2007 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 25 | 19.3 |
August 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
August 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
September 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
October 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
September 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
September 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
November 1994 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 31.1 |
October 1992 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 25 | 26.2 |
November 1989 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Serious | 25 | 19.3 |