COUNTY HIGHWAY over BIG CEDAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.89167, -98.8133341°53'30" N, 98°48'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over BIG CEDAR CREEK |
Structure number: | C003612810P |
Location: | 17E 7.5N BURWELL |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 26.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Serious | 5 | 26.5 |
October 2015 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 5 | 26.5 |
July 2014 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 5 | 25.5 |
October 2013 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Serious | 5 | 24.5 |
October 2011 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Serious | 5 | 24.5 |
August 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 5 | 24.5 |
October 2009 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 5 | 24.5 |
September 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 5 | 28.5 |
December 2007 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 5 | 40.7 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 5 | 54.8 |
September 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 5 | 54.8 |
October 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 5 | 52.9 |
November 1999 | Fair | Fair | Excellent | Fair | 5 | 44.9 |
January 1998 | Fair | Fair | Excellent | Satisfactory | 5 | 51.9 |
November 1995 | Fair | Fair | Excellent | Good | 5 | 51.9 |
November 1993 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Serious | 5 | 24.5 |
November 1991 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Serious | 5 | 24.5 |