COUNTY HIGHWAY over MOSES HILL LAGOON TRIB
Map
Coordinates:
+40.50333, -99.4933340°30'12" N, 99°29'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over MOSES HILL LAGOON TRIB |
Structure number: | C006911705 |
Location: | .5E 1.5N LOOMIS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Total length: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2003] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 35 | 88.7 |
September 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 35 | 88.7 |
September 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 35 | 88.7 |
September 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 35 | 88.4 |
September 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 35 | 88.4 |
September 2008 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 35 | 88.4 |
October 2006 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 35 | 100.0 |
October 2004 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 35 | 100.0 |
October 2002 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 35 | 100.0 |
September 2000 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 35 | 100.0 |
August 1999 | Poor | N out of 10 | 35 | 40.2 |
October 1998 | Fair | N out of 10 | 35 | 49.3 |
October 1996 | Fair | N out of 10 | 35 | 40.0 |
October 1994 | Fair | N out of 10 | 35 | 41.0 |
November 1992 | Fair | N out of 10 | 35 | 48.0 |
October 1990 | Fair | N out of 10 | 35 | 52.1 |