Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over IRRIGATION CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+40.48167, -99.32500
40°28'54" N, 99°19'30" W
+40.48167, -99.32500
40°28'54" N, 99°19'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over IRRIGATION CANAL |
| Structure number: | C006913005 |
| Location: | 2N 1.8E HOLDREGE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 5° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2016 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2003] |
| Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No deficiencies [9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 20 | 99.9 |
| October 2014 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 39.9 |
| October 2012 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 40.0 |
| October 2010 | Fair | N out of 10 | 20 | 56.2 |
| October 2008 | Fair | N out of 10 | 20 | 56.2 |
| October 2006 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 70.0 |
| October 2004 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 70.0 |
| September 2002 | Fair | N out of 10 | 20 | 97.0 |
| October 2000 | Fair | N out of 10 | 20 | 97.0 |
| October 1998 | Fair | N out of 10 | 20 | 98.0 |
| October 1997 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 95.0 |
| October 1995 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 95.0 |
| November 1993 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 95.0 |
| October 1991 | Poor | N out of 10 | 20 | 91.1 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1352316
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1352316