Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over CROOKED CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.83667, -97.12167
40°50'12" N, 97°07'18" W
+40.83667, -97.12167
40°50'12" N, 97°07'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over CROOKED CREEK |
| Structure number: | C008002710 |
| Location: | 5E OF GOEHNER |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1935 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 45 [as of 2003] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 45 | 49.4 |
| June 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 45 | 49.4 |
| December 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 45 | 41.3 |
| March 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 45 | 43.5 |
| May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 45 | 44.3 |
| April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 45 | 44.3 |
| May 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 45 | 42.3 |
| October 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 32.0 |
| October 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 32.0 |
| November 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 31.9 |
| November 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 31.9 |
| November 1997 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 29.9 |
| November 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 29.9 |
| November 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 29.9 |
| October 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 45 | 31.4 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1354239
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1354239