N96 over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.78498, -99.1572441°47'06" N, 99°09'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | N96 over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
Structure number: | S096 01843 |
Location: | JCT N11/N91 .6W 1N |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Total length: | 141.1 ft. [43.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 800 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 22.1 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 800 | 22.1 |
March 2015 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 800 | 22.1 |
March 2013 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 800 | 35.2 |
March 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 790 | 36.1 |
March 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 895 | 35.8 |
March 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 915 | 38.1 |
March 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1155 | 35.4 |
July 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 940 | 38.1 |
March 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1050 | 35.7 |
July 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1090 | 35.6 |
July 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1125 | 35.5 |
October 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 735 | 33.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 700 | 408 | 0 | 292 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 3,990 | 2,890 | 0 | 0 | 1,100 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,384 | 0 | 3,384 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 0 | 20 | 48 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 192 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Steel Pile | each | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 96 | 76 | 5 | 15 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 182 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 282 | 236 | 0 | 46 | 0 |