Share:

NOTTINGHAM ROAD over LAMPREY RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+43.14248, -71.23199
43°08'33" N, 71°13'55" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NOTTINGHAM ROAD over LAMPREY RIVER
Structure number:006001490009800
Location:0.15 MI. RTE 107
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:780 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$3,142,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
September 2017Good7 out of 1078099.9
September 2015Good7 out of 1075099.9
October 2013Good7 out of 1075099.9
August 2011Good7 out of 1075099.9
August 2009Good7 out of 1080099.9
October 2007Good7 out of 1072099.9
September 2005Good7 out of 1072099.9
August 2003Good7 out of 1065099.9
July 2001Good7 out of 1065099.9
September 1997Good7 out of 1065099.9
September 1995Good7 out of 10650100.0
February 1994Good7 out of 1068099.9
July 1991Good8 out of 10660099.5