Share:

LOWER LANDSDOWN RD over CAPOOLONG CREEK

Hunterdon County, New Jersey

Map

Coordinates:
+40.60774, -74.91600
40°36'28" N, 74°54'58" W

View more info at Bridgehunter.com

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	LOWER LANDSDOWN RD over CAPOOLONG CREEK
Structure number:	10XXF82
Location:	0.4 M E OF CR 617
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Collector (Rural) `[08]`
Length of largest span:	87.9 ft. `[26.8 m]`
Total length:	94.2 ft. `[28.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	18.4 ft. `[5.6 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	13.5 ft. `[4.1 m]`
Skew angle:	17°
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1885
Year reconstructed:	1982
Historic significance:	Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[2]`
Main span material:	Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron `[9]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: April 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	150 `[as of 2017]`
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	24.2
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$1,963,000

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2017	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	150	24.2
April 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	150	24.2
April 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	148	32.9
May 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	1330	32.1
April 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	1330	32.1
April 2007	Fair	Good	Fair	Satisfactory	720	19.9
April 2005	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	705	26.6
March 2003	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	690	19.9
March 2001	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	650	18.4
November 1998	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	650	18.4
October 1997	Fair	Good	Fair	Satisfactory	640	20.5
October 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	630	20.5
July 1994	Fair	Good	Fair	Good	600	21.2
March 1992	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	600	18.8

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Truss	linear ft.	176	143	28	5	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	759	687	12	0	60
Steel Floor Beam	linear ft.	102	0	20	82	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	621	591	0	0	30
Steel Pin or Pin & Hangar Assembly	each	24	16	8	0	0
Substructure
Masonry Abutment	linear ft.	46	0	30	16	0
Deck
Timber Deck	sq. ft.	1,720	1,246	284	190	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,457	927	0	280	250
Bearings
Other Bearing	each	4	0	1	3	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	188	188	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	595	595	0	0	0

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1365881