NM-108 over RUNNING WATER DRAW

Map

Coordinates:
+34.49976, -103.05554
34°29'59" N, 103°03'20" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	NM-108 over RUNNING WATER DRAW
Structure number:	000000000005726
Location:	7.7 MI N JCT US-60/TEXICO
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Collector (Rural) `[08]`
Length of largest span:	24.9 ft. `[7.6 m]`
Total length:	174.9 ft. `[53.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1956
Historic significance:	Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[3]`
Design load:	MS 13.5 / HS 15 `[3]`
Number of main spans:	7
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Channel beam `[22]`
Deck type:	Other `[9]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,907 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	22% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	55.9
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$283,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
August 2017	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	1907	55.9
August 2016	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	418	68.0
August 2015	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	442	67.9
August 2014	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	442	67.9
August 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	437	80.2
August 2012	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	444	80.2
March 2012	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	431	68.0
March 2011	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	2015	53.2
March 2010	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	2049	53.0
March 2009	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	2049	53.0
March 2008	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	2081	52.9
March 2006	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	2134	52.7
March 2004	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2204	66.3
March 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	975	69.4
February 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	303	79.6
September 1997	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	283	79.7
October 1995	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	277	77.4
January 1994	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	267	73.4
January 1992	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	275	73.3
January 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	208	78.9

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,400	0	960	440	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	4,206	0	4,206	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	3,680	0	3,680	0	0
Substructure
Steel Column	each	18	0	18	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	1,127	0	1,127	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	56	0	56	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	168	0	168	0	0
Joints
Open Joint	linear ft.	132	0	132	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	350	0	350	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	1,313	0	1,313	0	0