RTE 9B over GREAT CHAZY RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+44.94235, -73.40902
44°56'32" N, 73°24'32" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RTE 9B over GREAT CHAZY RIVER
Structure number:	000000001006270
Location:	IN VILL OF COOPERSVILLE
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	109.9 ft. `[33.5 m]`
Total length:	115.2 ft. `[35.1 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.2 ft. `[8.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.2 ft. `[9.8 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1930
Year reconstructed:	1991
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) `[2]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for other load-capacity restriction `[R]`
Average daily traffic:	2,782 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	11% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	31.3
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$4,976,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
August 2017	Poor	Good	Serious	Fair	2782	31.3
August 2015	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	2799	44.4
August 2013	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	2128	55.4
August 2011	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	2150	55.4
September 2009	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	2132	71.8
October 2007	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	2439	71.6
September 2005	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	2769	61.2
October 2003	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Fair	2769	61.2
September 2001	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Good	2769	73.5
September 1999	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Good	2059	84.0
June 1997	Fair	Very Good	Good	Satisfactory	2248	84.9
October 1995	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Fair	2248	73.6
August 1993	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2320	84.8
November 1991	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1589	67.8

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Stringer	linear ft.	1,029	860	108	60	1
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	4,503	4,503	0	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	3,580	3,573	0	7	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	3,351	3,344	0	7	0
Superstructure
Steel Truss	linear ft.	229	209	8	12	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	5,833	5,833	0	0	0
Steel Floor Beam	linear ft.	252	136	56	60	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	2,092	2,092	0	0	0
Steel Gusset Plate	each	14	5	5	3	1
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	406	406	0	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	120	0	120	0	0
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearing	each	4	4	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	16	16	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	229	229	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	1,716	1,716	0	0	0