Share:

RTE 9W over CEDAR POND BROOK

Map

Coordinates:
+41.22805, -73.98755
41°13'41" N, 73°59'15" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 9W over CEDAR POND BROOK
Structure number:000000001007140
Location:0.2 MI S JCT RTS 9W & 210
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:164.1 ft. [50.0 m]
Total length:399.0 ft. [121.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:43.3 ft. [13.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:58.4 ft. [17.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2009
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,047 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:70.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$13,849,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2017GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellent1404770.2
November 2015GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1699169.0
October 2013GoodGoodExcellentGood1699169.0
September 2011GoodGoodExcellentExcellent1310071.1
December 2009GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent1313071.1
July 2008PoorFairPoorSatisfactory1724130.0
August 2007FairFairFairSatisfactory1724146.0
July 2006FairFairFairSatisfactory1546746.0
July 2005FairFairFairSatisfactory1546746.0
September 2004FairFairFairSatisfactory1546746.0
December 2003FairFairFairSatisfactory1546746.0
December 2002FairFairFairSatisfactory1546714.3
November 2001FairFairFairSatisfactory1546752.0
November 2000FairFairFairSatisfactory1409552.0
November 1999PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory1409561.0
November 1998PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory1383161.0
October 1997PoorPoorFairFair1363350.0
December 1996PoorPoorPoorPoor1363334.0
September 1995PoorPoorPoorFair1719916.2
October 1994PoorPoorPoorFair1696816.2
November 1992PoorPoorFairFair382036.9
December 1991PoorPoorFairPoor1565717.9

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.2,7582,758000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.40,01040,010000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.23,06023,060000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.17,134011,9945,1400
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.3636000
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.124124000
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footinglinear ft.124124000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.116116000
Joints
Pourable Jointlinear ft.6060000
Assembly with Sealeach6060000
Bearings
Pot Bearingeach2825210
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.5656000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.788788000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.788788000
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.788788000