RTE 13 over CHITTENANGO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.97794, -75.8413642°58'41" N, 75°50'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 13 over CHITTENANGO CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001010560 |
Location: | 3 MI N JCT US 20 & SH 13 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 82.7 ft. [25.2 m] |
Total length: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 27° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 786 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.1 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,038,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 786 | 98.1 |
July 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 799 | 98.1 |
June 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 799 | 99.1 |
May 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11710 | 84.5 |
May 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11777 | 84.4 |
May 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 12635 | 83.4 |
April 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11710 | 84.5 |
April 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 924 | 99.0 |
April 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 924 | 99.0 |
April 1999 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 896 | 97.0 |
May 1997 | Good | - | Good | Good | 833 | 97.1 |
April 1995 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 833 | 97.1 |
May 1993 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2166 | 94.5 |
March 1991 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2297 | 94.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 102 | 101 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 102 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 83 | 81 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 297 | 0 | 297 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 166 | 83 | 83 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,862 | 3,512 | 100 | 250 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,016 | 1,024 | 1,992 | 0 | 0 |