Share:

RTE 22 over LITTLE AUSABLE R.

Clinton County, New York

Map

Coordinates:
+44.57796, -73.52666
44°34'41" N, 73°31'36" W

View more info at Bridgehunter.com

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RTE 22 over LITTLE AUSABLE R.
Structure number:	000000001017260
Location:	0.1 MI S JCT RTS 22 + 22B
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	123.7 ft. `[37.7 m]`
Total length:	128.0 ft. `[39.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	40.0 ft. `[12.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	47.6 ft. `[14.5 m]`
Skew angle:	25°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1974
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	7,332 `[as of 2018]`
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	94.2
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,125,000

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2018	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Good	7332	94.2
July 2016	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	6342	94.5
July 2014	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	5642	95.8
August 2012	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	6300	95.6
August 2010	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	3921	96.5
July 2008	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	3964	96.5
July 2006	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	7775	94.0
August 2004	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	7775	94.0
June 2002	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	7775	95.0
May 2000	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	7775	95.0
September 1998	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	7518	95.1
June 1996	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	7230	95.2
June 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Satisfactory	6902	96.4
August 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Satisfactory	5391	84.0
July 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Satisfactory	6866	83.4

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	625	625	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	15,530	13,627	1,553	280	70
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	6,097	5,874	0	223	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	5,134	5,134	0	0	0
Joints
Compression Joint	linear ft.	106	105	1	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	5	5	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	31	23	4	4	0
Fixed Bearing	each	5	5	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	31	18	0	13	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	257	257	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	1,448	1,196	250	0	2

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1377417