Share:

RTE 23A over SPRUCE CREEK

Greene County, New York

Map

Coordinates:
+42.19127, -74.07071
42°11'29" N, 74°04'15" W

View more info at Bridgehunter.com

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RTE 23A over SPRUCE CREEK
Structure number:	000000001017980
Location:	JCT 23A & KAATERSKILL FLS
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Total length:	30.8 ft. `[9.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.3 ft. `[7.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1920
Year reconstructed:	1992
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Other `[9]`
Wearing surface:	Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) `[2]`

Latest Available Inspection: May 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	2,357 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	59.2
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$918,000

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2017	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	2357	59.2
May 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	2703	51.7
June 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	2703	58.5
June 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	4000	58.2
June 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	3570	59.0
July 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	3043	60.1
July 2005	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	3558	39.9
December 2004	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	3307	59.5
July 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	3513	59.1
August 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	3513	59.1
June 1999	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	3509	71.4
June 1997	Fair	Good	Fair	Satisfactory	3574	59.0
June 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	3290	59.4
June 1993	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Fair	3550	58.9
August 1991	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	Fair	4195	62.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	180	0	177	3	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	770	0	684	77	9
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	867	0	867	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	756	0	756	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	68	0	53	15	0
Masonry Abutment	linear ft.	96	0	89	7	0
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing	linear ft.	20	0	20	0	0
Joints
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	116	0	116	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	12	0	0	12	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	48	0	0	0	48
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	62	0	62	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	670	0	670	0	0

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1377485