RTE 987G over RTE 52
Map
Coordinates:
+41.55785, -73.7805341°33'28" N, 73°46'50" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 987G over RTE 52 |
Structure number: | 000000001026879 |
Location: | JCT TSP & RTE 52 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Total length: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 27° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1937 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 41,483 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 39.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,499,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 41483 | 39.5 |
August 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 27475 | 38.5 |
June 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 27475 | 38.6 |
May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 27500 | 53.2 |
May 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3242 | 65.5 |
April 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3242 | 65.5 |
April 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3242 | 66.6 |
March 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3242 | 65.6 |
March 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3149 | 64.4 |
March 1999 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 3197 | 52.7 |
April 1997 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3181 | 64.4 |
April 1995 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 4025 | 51.6 |
April 1993 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3934 | 62.5 |
March 1991 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2920 | 71.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 106 | 28 | 77 | 1 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 55 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 120 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 0 |
Masonry Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 111 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,623 | 0 | 2,183 | 440 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,364 | 0 | 0 | 2,214 | 150 |