RTE 82 over E B WAPPINGER CRK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.80168, -73.7572841°48'06" N, 73°45'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 82 over E B WAPPINGER CRK |
Structure number: | 000000001032360 |
Location: | 2.25 KM N JCT US44 & SH82 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 96.8 ft. [29.5 m] |
Total length: | 98.1 ft. [29.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.8 ft. [10.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2002 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,827 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,326,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 2827 | 88.0 |
October 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 2877 | 88.0 |
October 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 2877 | 88.0 |
October 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 2900 | 88.0 |
October 2009 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 2963 | 88.9 |
October 2007 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 3439 | 88.4 |
October 2005 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 3415 | 88.5 |
November 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 3415 | 81.9 |
April 2001 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2016 | 50.4 |
November 1999 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2229 | 49.8 |
November 1997 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1625 | 53.8 |
November 1996 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 1625 | 35.8 |
November 1995 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Serious | 1625 | 10.5 |
November 1993 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1625 | 53.6 |
September 1991 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2266 | 49.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 470 | 470 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,475 | 3,155 | 250 | 70 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,145 | 2,895 | 250 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 108 | 93 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 200 | 0 | 150 | 50 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,725 | 0 | 875 | 800 | 50 |