Share:

RTE 987C over LAKE TIORATI BRK

Map

Coordinates:
+41.24897, -74.03842
41°14'56" N, 74°02'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 987C over LAKE TIORATI BRK
Structure number:000000001068880
Location:1.3 MI N JCT PIP+RTE 210
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:31.5 ft. [9.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:State Park, Forest, or Reservation Agency [11]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:247 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:62.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,764,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2018Poor-SatisfactoryPoor24762.3
October 2017Poor-SatisfactoryPoor25062.3
November 2016Poor-SatisfactoryPoor22561.4
September 2015Poor-SatisfactoryPoor25861.4
October 2014Poor-SatisfactoryPoor25860.2
October 2013Poor-SatisfactoryPoor24960.2
October 2012Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527573.3
November 2010Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527575.4
November 2008Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527575.4
November 2006Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527575.4
November 2004Poor-SatisfactoryPoor1527559.5
December 2002Poor-SatisfactoryPoor1527559.0
November 2000Poor-SatisfactoryPoor1527559.0
December 1998Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactory1527588.4
November 1996Fair-FairFair1527579.2
November 1994Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527577.9
November 1992Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527577.9
September 1990Fair-SatisfactoryFair1527579.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Archlinear ft.34017170
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.234023400
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footinglinear ft.174017400