BLEECKER STREET over CAYADUTTA CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+43.06484, -74.34721
43°03'53" N, 74°20'50" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	BLEECKER STREET over CAYADUTTA CREEK
Structure number:	000000002204340
Location:	CITY OF GLOVERSVILLE
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Collector (Urban) `[17]`
Length of largest span:	10.8 ft. `[3.3 m]`
Total length:	25.9 ft. `[7.9 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	25.9 ft. `[7.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	50.5 ft. `[15.4 m]`
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1914
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Not applicable `[N]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	895 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. `[4]`
Sufficiency rating:	55.9
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$449,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2018	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	895	55.9
April 2017	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	902	55.9
April 2016	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	912	55.9
April 2015	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	796	53.9
April 2014	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	796	53.9
May 2013	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	843	53.9
April 2012	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	860	53.9
April 2011	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	860	53.9
April 2010	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	855	57.0
April 2009	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	855	57.0
April 2008	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	855	57.0
April 2007	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	855	57.0
April 2006	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	981	42.9
April 2005	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	981	42.9
May 2004	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	981	42.9
May 2002	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	981	42.8
May 2001	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	981	42.8
July 2000	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	1069	41.7
July 1999	Poor	Fair	Serious	Serious	1069	24.5
July 1998	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Serious	1069	25.5
September 1997	Poor	-	Serious	Serious	1069	25.5
August 1996	Poor	-	Serious	Serious	1069	30.1
July 1995	Poor	-	Serious	Serious	300	36.8
August 1994	Poor	-	Serious	Serious	300	35.4
July 1993	Poor	-	Fair	Serious	300	35.4
July 1992	Poor	-	Fair	Serious	300	35.4
August 1991	Poor	-	Fair	Serious	300	34.4

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	102	0	102	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	28	24	4	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	102	90	12	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing	linear ft.	63	0	63	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	26	0	20	6	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	134	0	0	40	94
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slab	sq. ft.	718	572	0	146	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	666	400	259	0	7