COUNTY ROAD 70A over BIG CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.35716, -77.6544842°21'26" N, 77°39'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD 70A over BIG CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000003334740 |
Location: | 1.1 MILES NE OF N HORNELL |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 85.0 ft. [25.9 m] |
Total length: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 50° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1936 |
Year reconstructed: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,601 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.7 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,622,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1601 | 76.7 |
October 2015 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1651 | 76.6 |
October 2013 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1651 | 76.6 |
October 2011 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1960 | 76.4 |
October 2009 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1712 | 76.6 |
October 2007 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1712 | 76.6 |
October 2005 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1788 | 77.5 |
October 2003 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 1788 | 77.5 |
October 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1788 | 88.7 |
November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1788 | 78.6 |
November 1997 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 79.0 |
November 1995 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 1100 | 52.0 |
November 1993 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 1100 | 52.0 |
September 1991 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 1100 | 52.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 340 | 340 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 3,373 | 0 | 3,204 | 0 | 169 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,728 | 2,728 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,552 | 2,494 | 58 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 112 | 0 | 104 | 8 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 57 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 176 | 176 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 609 | 0 | 609 | 0 | 0 |